How to Utilize Proof in Your Research Paper

A research paper is an essay that discusses or analyzes a particular aspect of a topic. Whatever discipline of study you're studying, your research paper must present your thinking supported by other contador palabras's observations and opinions. A lawyer studies the opinions of other people to draw comparisons, then applies them to their case to justify their argument. Doctors interpret medical information and analyze them for patients who are unable to communicate with their physicians.

One area in which this happens often is in the area of education. One of the papers I've had the pleasure of reading was written by Bahador Bahrami, an associate professor at the University of Toronto. Bahrami employs a similar method to my own, the presupposition reverser, to demonstrate how our prior beliefs about a subject have led to a reality that was contrary. His essay starts with the statement "Our beliefs about language were deeply ingrained."

The premise he uses is strong as is his argument. As I mentioned, his starting point is an assumption. It's a valid one. He goes on to explain how this assumption about language causes problems in his writing. The problem lies mostly in his use of language, but his entire argument is couched in his usage of language. I'll give him credit, but he is correct when he states his reason to use this particular word, "theorizing," in the last paragraph of his argument.

This is a great way to demonstrate the importance of your writing and your ability to analyse and critique information that is already in existence. Without the ability to apply the knowledge you have learned in your research papers your writing won't be particularly unique. I'm sure you do.

The argument he is arguing about boils down to this: He believes (and it is true this assumption) that your primary idea works and then builds his argument from there. However, when you read his arguments, you do not see the central idea until he articulates it. He makes many presuppositions to support his main idea and that's why the meanings of "proposition" or "intuition" aren't recognized. In other words, he commits the fallacy of induction. Check out my previous post on this topic for more information on this topic.

To challenge his argument, I would like to ask you what your primary idea is. It doesn't matter what other people think about it if it's not right. You've proven to that your notion is wrong There's no need to debate it with them. And if it's right and it's not a matter of the opinions of others. To prove your point, simply look at your argument.

There will be those who don't agree with me and will argue that there could be both a primary and secondary argument. I'm not sure how significant this issue is, and it might be something that can be addressed by discussing the details of your argument. I won't discuss it now. I'll leave this to be an exercise in intelligence.

This is a challenging subject, and it's one which many students quit before even attempting it. It doesn't have to be. It is crucial to remember that the aim is to prove your argument using logic and evidence. This cannot be accomplished without a convincing argument.

So, what makes a good argument for your paper? There are two kinds of proof. A deductive proof is built on facts. It might seem easy but if you think about it, you'll discover that there are a lot of deductive arguments. For instance when I say you shouldn't buy this car due to the issues that exist with it, then you're already proving that my main point is true.

It's easy to slip into the'slippery slope of proof' in which logic is used to justify your argument. You could argue, for instance that since I mentioned that the car was old, it must be true. You'd be correct, but the fact is that you've made an argument, and that's all it is. Inductive arguments can be used. For example, you might say that since I've advised you to purchase a car due to it being cheaper than a different car brand, then it must be true. The argument here is that since you have personal experience with cars with lower prices that you should believe this particular brand more (since it has worked for you).).

Proper proof is crucial to making your research paper effective and successful. Be sure to read your argument through to the end. Also, make sure that you provide proof of your argument in the conclusion of your paper before letting readers learn any other information from your paragraph. This way, you'll ensure that they get the main message and that your argument is sound and valid.


צ’רלי בוזגלו, משרד עורכי דין ונוטריון

המשרד מתמחה במשפט מסחרי (תאגידים), דיני עבודה, דיני חוזים, נזיקין, זכויות יוצרים, לשון הרע, הגנת הפרטיות, דיני תקשורת, משפט וספורט, מקרקעין, משפט מנהלי, גישור ושירותי נוטריון.

משרדנו מאפשר נגישות, זמינות ונוחות רבה מאד לצורך מתן השירותים המשפטיים.

שלחו לנו הודעה

    כל הזכויות שמורות © צ’רלי בוזגלו, משרד עורכי דין ונוטריון | עוצב ופותח על ידי סולה
    Skip to content